Awesome. OK. Good afternoon, everybody. A packed room today. Thank you all for coming. President Trump is making America affordable again through his proven economic formula of powerful tariffs, fair trade deals, massive middle class tax cuts, energy dominance and aggressive deregulation. The overwhelmingly positive economic data released this week underscores the significant progress the president has already delivered.
Tuesday's CPI report marked the latest confirmation that President Trump has defeated Joe Biden's inflation crisis. Since President Trump took office, core CPI has increased at just a 2.4 percent annualized rate, substantially lower than the 3.3 percent annual rate inherited from the Biden administration last January.
Importantly, as inflation cools, American's wages are rising, giving the American people more purchasing power. And with what is likely recorded -- or likely going to be a record breaking tax refund season in the next couple of weeks, the American people will be reaping the rewards of the massive tax cuts that were signed into law by the president.
Thanks to President Trump's signing of no tax on tips, overtime, Social Security, boosting the child tax credit and locking in the 2017 Trump tax cuts, independent estimates project the average American tax filer could expect up to an extra $1,000 bump to their tax refund next year. This is going to be a helpful boost to working families who are making ends meet.
On the energy front, the national average price for a gallon of regular gas this week fell to its lowest level in five years thanks to President Trump's drill baby drill agenda. According to GasBuddy, the average price for regular gas on Monday was below $3.00 per gallon in 43 states, below $2.75 per gallon in 30 states and at or below $2.50 per gallon in 17 states.
In fact, gas prices were below $2.00 a gallon at stations in at least 19 states. Don't forget this was unheard of just a couple of short years ago. Overall, drivers are projected to spend $11 billion less at the gas pump this year than they did last year, resulting in hundreds of dollars in critical savings for the average American family.
We're also seeing the housing market rebound as borrowing costs ease and income growth outpaces home price gains. According to a new report also released this week from the National Association of Realtors, existing home sales in December rose to their fastest pace in three years. To further improve housing affordability, President Trump has recently announced and directed Fannie and Freddie to purchase $200 billion worth of mortgage bonds.
As a result of these actions, mortgage rates have fallen to their lowest level in years. As of last Friday, rates for the average 30 year mortgage are down more than one full percentage point. Because of these significant declines, monthly housing payments are now at their lowest level in two years, and we expect this decrease to continue.
As someone who was enormously successful in real estate, President Trump understands that owning a home is about more than just having a physical asset. It's about empowering young people to stake their claim in the American dream. It's about giving newlyweds a place to make their own and start a family.
It's about promoting the spirit of hard work, determination and, yes, the rugged individualism that has made America the greatest country in the history of the world. President Trump knows America is strongest when it's a nation of owners, not renters, and he is determined to unlock that opportunity for as many Americans as possible.
That's why he will outline additional housing initiatives during his major speech in Davos next week. And we look forward to seeing many of you there. Finally, this morning President Trump unveiled a health care plan for America called the great health care plan in a video message detailing his solutions to lower costs for all Americans and significantly improve our health care system.
The great health care plan will accomplish this through four common sense pillars. Number one, permanently lowering prescription drug prices. Congress can get this done by codifying President Trump's historic most favored nation initiatives into law to guarantee Americans the same low prices for prescription drugs that people in other countries around the world pay; additionally, by increasing consumer choice by making more verified safe pharmaceutical drugs available for over-the-counter purchases.
Number two, the great health care plan will stop sending big insurance companies billions in extra taxpayer funded subsidy payments and instead send that money directly to eligible Americans to allow them to buy the health insurance of their choice; additionally, by funding a cost sharing reduction program for health care plans and ending kickbacks from pharmacy benefit managers to large brokerage middlemen.
Number three, the great health care plan will maximize price transparency by requiring any health care provider or insurer who accepts either Medicare or Medicaid to publicly and prominently post their pricing and fees to avoid surprise medical bills. This is an incredibly popular policy that has been bipartisan for many years, and President Trump is officially and firmly calling on Congress to get it done.
And number four, hold big insurance companies accountable by requiring them to publish rate and coverage comparisons up front on their websites in plain English so consumers and everyday Americans can make the best purchasing decisions for them and their families. These are common sense actions that make up President Trump's great health care plan, and they represent the most comprehensive and bold agenda to lower health care costs to have ever been considered by the federal government.
Congress should immediately take up President Trump's plan and pass it into law. For Americans watching at home, you can visit greathealthcare.gov right now for more information on the great healthcare plan. And with that, we will open it up to questions. In our new media seat today, we have a familiar face, Riley Gaines.
I'm surprised it took us a year to get you here, but I'm very happy to see you. I know you have a new podcast, The Riley Gaines Show. And so, thank you. And you brought a beautiful baby and your lovely husband too. So, thank you so much for joining. And why don't you kick us off?
Absolutely. Well, thank you. First and foremost, congratulations to you. Being a girl mom will change your life in the best way possible, so excited you get to shop all the pink and the frilly and the bows. I was in Washington DC earlier this week for the Supreme Court case. There were two arguments that were heard surrounding sex based rights and if it's constitutional for states to pass laws that ultimately protect those rights for women.
If the Supreme Court rules as anticipated in favor of maintaining these sex based rights, is the administration prepared to take action against the states -- I believe at this point it's 23 states that don't have those protections for women.
Absolutely. And as you know, Riley, the administration already has done so. We've taken action in a number of fronts against these states who are failing to uphold the president's executive orders and this administration's policy of simply protecting women in women's sports and in women's private spaces.
We've gone to the mat with large universities in this country as well to try to fight for what's fair and what's just for women and girls across the country so I know you were at the arguments. I listened to them myself, as a woman and as a former athlete. And I think the president speaks on common sense on this issue, that women's sports and private spaces should be protected and that there are two genders, there are two sexes.
That is not something we should be afraid to say in this country. And I think, frankly, it was quite alarming to not only hear a couple of Justices gravel over that basic fundamental biological fact, that men and women are different but inherently equal. But we are certainly different and women deserve such rights.
We hope and expect that the Supreme Court will rule in the right way on this matter.
[Crosstalk] Thank you. Gabe.
Karoline, thank you very much. A lot to talk about.
Sure.
What can --
Isn't there always a lot to talk about?
Always a lot to talk about. What can you share about the president's meeting with Maria Corina Machado? Is it underway?
I can.
What can you share about that? And then also, the president said yesterday that Delcy Rodriguez was, quote, "a terrific person". Does the president trust the remaining members of the Maduro regime?
I will say, to your first question, the meeting was about to begin as I was stepping out of the Oval Office moments ago. So my understanding is that it's underway right now. I know the president was looking forward to this meeting and he was expecting it to be a good and positive discussion with Ms. Machado, who is really a remarkable and brave voice for many of the people of Venezuela.
So the president looks forward to, obviously, talking to her about the realities on the ground in the country and what is taking place. As for Ms. Rodriguez, the president did speak with her directly this week, as you know. He revealed that to all of you yesterday. And Secretary Rubio and the administration have been in constant communication with Ms. Rodriguez and other members of the interim government in Venezuela.
They have been extremely cooperative. They have thus far met all of the demands and requests of the United States and of the president. And I think you have all seen that play out. We obviously had a $500 million energy deal that was struck in large part because of the cooperation from Ms. Rodriguez. Venezuela and Ms. Rodriguez have also confirmed that they will be releasing political prisoners from Venezuela.
There were five Americans who were recently released this week as well. So the president likes what he's seeing and we'll expect that cooperation to continue.
And regarding the investigation into the leak that the president referenced yesterday, what is the administration's position on The Washington Post Reporter? The Post has reported that she was told that she is not a target of the investigation. Does the administration believe she did anything wrong? And then also, what is the administration's position on the Pentagon Papers case from the 1970s that affirmed reporters right to publish classified information under certain circumstances?
Well, since this is an active investigation, I don't want to comment on it much more than what we did yesterday, to obviously confirm the investigation. And I can confirm what the attorney general stated and the president as well, which is that the individual, unfortunately a contractor at the Pentagon, chose to unlawfully leak classified and very serious information to this Washington Post reporter.
Hence, why the reporter's home was -- was looked into by the FBI, rightfully so. And the administration is not going to tolerate leaks, especially from within the national security apparatus of the United States government that put our nation's integrity and our national security at risk, full stop. The president will not support that.
I know the secretary of war will not support that and it will not stand. And legal action will be taken against anyone, whether it's a member of the press or whether it's an employee for a federal agency, who breaks the law. If you break the law and if you endanger our men and women in uniform, you are going to be held accountable, period, full stop.
But does this administration --
Jackie.
Does this administration believe that this reporter, or any reporter, has a right to publish classified information under certain circumstances?
Look, I think that we do not believe that individuals who have been given the privilege of holding a top secret clearance should be illegally leaking that classified information. And I know the American people agree with that. And I think it's a basic tenet of journalistic integrity not to publish information that could directly endanger the operational security or the brave men and women who are serving this country in uniform and putting themselves in harm's way, to protect not just the people of this administration, but all of you in the press and all of their fellow Americans as well.
Jackie.
Thank you, Karoline. I wanted to get the White House reaction to Iranian state TV broadcasting an implicit threat to the president's life. It was images of the assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania, according to reports, with the message, this time it will not go wrong.
I have not seen that, to be honest with you, Jackie. We'll take a look and I'll let the president and his national security team examine that footage to ensure its legitimacy. Again, I haven't seen it, so I can't comment on it. What I will say with respect to Iran is that the president and his team have communicated to the Iranian regime that the -- if the killing continues, there will be grave consequences.
And the president received a message, as he revealed to all of you and the whole world yesterday, that the killing and the executions will stop. And the president understands today that 800 executions that were scheduled and supposed to take place yesterday were halted. And so the president and his team are closely monitoring this situation and all options remain on the table for the president.
[Inaudible] Netanyahu encouraged him against strikes?
Look, it's true that president spoke with Prime Minister Netanyahu, but I would never detail details about their conversation without giving the expressed approval by the president himself. Weijia.
Thank you, Karoline. Is it still the president's assessment that it would be very hard for Ms. Machado to leave Venezuela, because he says she lacks the respect and support in that country? And will he raise that with her today?
I think the president's assessment that you just pointed out was based on realities on the ground. It was a realistic assessment based on what the president was reading and hearing from his advisors and national security team. And at this moment in time, his opinion on that matter has not changed.
He has also said that he would like there to be elections in Venezuela when the time is right.
That's right.
Do you have any update on when that might be? And is he committed to a transition to democracy for Venezuela?
Yes, and he is also committed to hopefully seeing elections in Venezuela one day, but I don't have an updated timetable for you today. Reagan, in the back.
Thanks, Karoline. A question for you on Minnesota and then also Venezuela.
Sure.
President Trump threatened invoking the Insurrection Act today in a Truth Social post. I'm wondering what his tipping point is, like what would it take for him to invoke the Insurrection Act?
Look, that's only a question, frankly, Reagan, the president can answer. But the Insurrection Act is a tool at the president's disposal. As you know, it has been used sparingly, but it has been used by previous presidents in American history. And I think the president's Truth Social post spoke very loud and clear to Democrats across this country, elected officials who are using their platforms to encourage violence against federal law enforcement officers, who are encouraging left-wing agitators to unlawfully obstruct legitimate law enforcement operations.
And if you talk to any law enforcement officer, no matter what level they work at, they want to be working with their counterparts, whether that's at the federal level -- or the federal authorities wanting to work with their counterparts at the state and local level. And it's truly shameful that now for more than a year, you've had elected Democrat governors and mayors who have basically held their state and local law enforcement hostage and told them, you cannot cooperate with federal law enforcement.
Why? They cooperated under the Biden administration. It's because these Democrats are deranged in their hatred for President Trump and they are holding their state and local law enforcement hostage as a result. And these Democrat mayors and governors are doing this over what, over the -- over the lawful and legitimate law enforcement operations to remove violent criminals from the streets of Minnesota, from the streets of California, from the streets of New York and from the streets of every state.
Across this country. And you don't see these riots and this vandalism taking place in states like Florida. Why? Because you have a governor in that state who has empowered federal and local authorities to work together and it's despicable. What we're seeing from these Democrat politicians, especially in sanctuary states and cities across the country.
And then yesterday, Karoline -- Go ahead. John.
Oh, thank you so much.
You're welcome.
My question is, President Trump has talked twice in recent days, once at the Kennedy Center and then to Reuters again last night, about canceling the election. Why is he talking about this?
I believe you're referring to the president's interview at Reuters last night. I was in that interview. It was a closed door interview. Obviously, there was not audio or video. The president was simply joking. He was saying, we're doing such a great job, we're doing everything the American people thought, maybe we should just keep rolling, but he was speaking facetiously.
And one more --
Sure.
-- on the Labor secretary. She's under investigation. Has he spoken to her about this?
I don't know if the president has spoken directly to the secretary. If they have, I'm unfamiliar with that conversation, but I have spoken to the president about that report regarding the secretary. He's aware of the internal investigation and he stands by the secretary and he thinks that she's doing a tremendous job at the Department of Labor on behalf of American workers.
Karoline?
PBS, go ahead.
You were mentioning a moment ago about working federal, state and local officials in Minneapolis. Governor Walz's office is saying today that he's trying to get ahold directly with the president. Have they spoken? And if they haven't, why haven't they spoken if there's a desire from Walz, as they're saying, to de-escalate what's happening there?
I'm not sure if that's a genuine offer to speak with the president. I was with the president about 30 minutes ago, and they hadn't spoken at that point. Look, the president is -- is always willing to answer the phone when people pick up and call. When there was another tragic shooting many months ago and Governor Walz's state, he spoke directly with the governor.
But I would ask that the governor stops inciting the harassment and illegal obstruction of law enforcement in his state. All ICE and federal law enforcement are trying to do are remove people like this off of the streets of Governor Walz's city in Minneapolis and of his state in Minnesota. If you look at some of the individuals in this photo, these are all illegal alien criminals who came into our country under the previous administration.
This is some of the most disturbing crimes you will ever read about, and there's only a few reporters in this room who will actually talk about these individuals. This is all ICE is trying to do. They are trying to remove people like this from Governor Walz's state. And so, yes, he should pick up the phone and he should say that he will cooperate with this president and with the federal government in making Minnesota safer, because that's all President Trump and his administration want to do. Mary?
Thanks, Karoline. The president says he wants money to go directly to Americans so they can buy their own insurance. How exactly would this work? And can the president assure Americans that this will be enough to cover their health care costs?
So, this is the second principle in the president's health care plan, lowering insurance premiums specifically, and ensuring that that money is going directly back to the American people and cutting the kickbacks that then raise those premiums. So, this plan, once put into legislative text and passed by Congress and sent to the president's desk, will stop sending big insurance companies billions of extra taxpayer funded subsidy payments, and instead send that money directly to eligible Americans to allow them to buy the health insurance of their choice through -- you may have heard it be referred to as health savings accounts.
Whether that ends up being the actual name of such accounts, we'll have to see. Again, Congress and the White House are going to work together to put this plan into action. And then secondly, the great health care plan will fund a cost sharing reduction program for health care plans, which will save taxpayers at least $36 billion and reduce the most common Obamacare plan premiums by over 10 percent.
And that's according to the Congressional Budget Office.
But 20 million Americans in recent weeks have seen their health care costs soar. Can he assure them that, if this plan is put in place, that they will be able to cover those costs?
If this plan is put in place, every single American who has health care in the United States will see lower costs as a result. They will see more transparency. All of these proposals that are within the great health care plan are incredibly popular with the American people. And they will impact everyone, not just a small fraction of those who are within the health care marketplace, but every single American will continue to see their costs go down.
And I will note that they already are and -- with respect to prescription drug prices when you look at what the president has done with most favored nations. You've seen these big pharmaceutical companies in the Oval Office saying that this president and his team were nonstop around the clock pressuring us and negotiating with us to lower the cost of prescription drugs for Americans.
And we are already seeing that to the tune, in some cases, of more than 500 percent. And that TrumpRx website is something that the administration will be formally launching very soon so Americans will have access to those lower lower costs of drugs. Josh?
Thank you. The president has called on credit card companies to lower or cap rates than 10 percent effective the 20th, next week. If they don't do that, what's his -- what'll he do? What's the threat?
Well, tariffs? No, I'm just kidding. The president certainly has an expectation, Josh, that the credit card companies will do this, just as he did with the pharmaceutical companies, that they will lower costs for American consumers. I don't have a specific consequence to outline for you. But certainly, this is an expectation and, frankly, a demand that the president has made.
Can you give us an update on the Fed? Sorry. There was some reporting from I think Fox Business that Rick Rieder had an interview this week scheduled. The president's indicated he's already made a selection, or at least some kind -- he's settling on someone. Where is he in that process, and when can we expect an announcement?
Is he still doing interviews?
Look, the president is in the same place, as you all have been asking about this for many, many weeks. He's in a decision making phase. There are a few people who he likes very much for this job, maybe less than that. The truth is, like with all decisions, it's a decision for the president to make. And he said to Reuters in that interview last night that he thinks he'll be finally making that decision in the next couple of weeks.
So, we will see.
And very quickly, there's been some criticism from other governments about Grok and xAI, the Twitter AI bot, and things it's been doing to manipulate images, including whether that would violate the Take It Down Act that the first lady has supported. We've not heard from this administration on it. Elon Musk says that they've disabled that, but I wanted to ask you whether the administration has a position and whether that's something that you will be pursuing or whether the president has talked to Mr. Musk about that.
Yes. I will talk to the Office of Science and Technology and we will get you a firm statement and answer on exactly where the administration stands. I don't want to speak on that without speaking with the experts on it.
Karoline?
Yes.
Just to follow up on the health care plan, one of the things in the Affordable Care Act was coverage of preexisting conditions. Is there any discussion or inclusion on that issue in the president's plan?
The president's plan that he outlined today will have no impact on individuals in this country with preexisting conditions. Obviously that's a continued conversation that the White House will have with Congress, but that's not the president's intention with the great health care plan.
Karoline? Karoline?
Go ahead.
Thanks, Karoline. Two questions on Minneapolis and --
And then -- go ahead.
Thanks. Two questions on Minneapolis --
Sure.
One on the ICE agent and the other on the rioting. I believe last night there were protesters or rioters that rifled through an FBI car, took weapons. We had a reporter embedded with ICE who said that she saw constant harassment all evening. Can you speak to the rhetoric we're hearing from Democrat politicians, whether they are causing violence against ICE, as well as some of the headlines we've seen not including the full story?
Yeah. I mean, to your first point, I think I've addressed that, that these Democrat governors and mayors in not just Minnesota but in states across the country are essentially -- you know, they've referred to ICE agents -- who, again, are brave men and women. And I would encourage everyone in this room, and I would encourage Governor Walz and other Democrats who are demeaning law enforcement, to sit down and have a cup of coffee with an ICE agent or a Border Patrol agent.
These are great patriotic men and women who have families, who put on the uniform every day and are following our nation's immigration laws at the direction of their bosses and -- and, again, at the direction of the law. They are simply trying to enforce the law. And the Democrat Party has demeaned these individuals.
They -- they've even referred to them as Nazis and as the Gestapo, and that is absolutely leading to the violence we're seeing in the streets. If you look at some of the images out of Minneapolis last night, look at this vehicle. Look at what it says. It says F ICE. You have these individuals who are putting their middle finger, proudly so, at the camera.
Another ICE individual -- a vehicle that was vandalized last night by these left wing agitators. People don't do this without encouragement from people in power, who make them feel like it's ok. Here's another one. And I'm pretty sure this car, you can't see it, said the best agent is a dead agent, or something to that effect.
This is despicable rhetoric that we're seeing, and the media is absolutely complicit in this violence because, if you look at the headline from CNN, protests erupt after federal agent shoots man in Minneapolis. That is not the story. That is not the truth. If you actually want to know the truth, you can look at what the Department of Homeland Security released, which is that this ICE agent was executing a targeted operation against a Venezuelan illegal alien who was unlawfully present in the country --
[Audio gap]
-- foot. And when this ICE agent tried to detain the individual, three more of his comrades came rushing out of a house and started ambushing and attacking the ICE agent. They used a shovel or a broom to smash his face in. And so, yes, that agent had to use self-defense and take up his weapon to protect his own life.
That is what's happening on the streets of Minneapolis. That's what's happening on the streets, unfortunately, of these Democrat run cities and states, where you have elected officials who are encouraging such -- such violence against our brave men and women in law enforcement.
Karoline? Karoline?
Andrew?
Thank you, Karoline. Two questions. First, to follow up on one of my colleagues who asked you about the president's interview with Reuters, you said that he was joking about canceling the elections, but Americans for generations have fought and died for democracy, for this democracy. Are you saying that the president finds the idea of canceling elections funny?
Andrew, were you in the room? No, you weren't. I was in the room. I heard the conversation. And only someone like you would take that so seriously and pose it -- the question in that way.
And then second, Karoline --
Phillip, go ahead.
Thank you, Karoline. Senator Elizabeth Warren said that the president called her earlier this week to discuss caps on credit card interest rates. I'm curious, would the president work with her and other Democrats in Congress on a legislative fix to this issue?
I think the president would work in good faith with anyone in Congress for a good legislative fix that would benefit the American people. And that's precisely why he called Senator Warren earlier this week on that matter.
Thanks, Karoline. Earlier, you were just defending ICE agents generally. And earlier on, Secretary Noem spoke to the media and she said, among other things, that they are doing everything correctly. 32 people died in ICE custody last year. 170 US citizens were detained by ICE. And Renee Good was shot in the head and killed by an ICE agent.
How does that equate to them doing everything correctly.
Why -- how was Renee Goode unfortunately and tragically killed?
Are you asking me my opinion?
Yeah. Mmm hmm.
Because an ICE agent acted recklessly and killed her unjustifiably.
Oh, OK, so you're a biased reporter with a left-wing opinion.
You asked me my opinion. What do you want me to do?
Yeah, because you're a left-wing hack. You're not a reporter. You're posing in this room as a journalist, and it's so clear by the premise of your question. And you and the people in the media who have such biases but fake like you're a journalist, you shouldn't even be sitting in that seat. But you're pretending like you're a journalist, but you're a left-wing activist.
[Inaudible]
And the question that you just raised and your answer proves your bias. You should be reporting on the facts. You should be reporting on the cases. Do you have the numbers of how many American citizens were killed at the hands of illegal aliens who ICE is trying to remove from this country? I bet you don't. I bet you didn't even read up on those stories.
I bet you never even read about Laken Riley or Jocelyn Nungaray or all of the innocent Americans who were killed at the hands of illegal aliens in this country. And the brave men and women of ICE are doing everything in their power to remove those heinous individuals and make our communities safer. And shame on people like you in the media who have a crooked view and have a biased view and pretend like you're a real, honest journalist.
What was inaccurate about -- Karoline?
Kelly?
Two quick questions on Iran. I wanted to ask first, just if you can say how close was the president to potentially launching strikes last night and was it the Gulf states that convinced him not to do that as some in the region there have said?
Well, look, Kelly, I know there's been a lot of speculation in the media about what the president is going to do at any given moment or any given night. And I would say, a lot of these stories, to be honest with you, I've been reading them and they have been based on anonymous sources who are pretending or guessing to know the president's thinking.
The truth is only President Trump knows what he's going to do and a very, very small team of advisers are read into his thinking on that. And as I just told you, he continues to closely monitor the situation on the ground in Iran. And as we saw yesterday, he had heard that the killings and executions would stop and we have seen 800 people, their lives have been spared as a result of that.
The president continues to closely monitor, but also keep all of his options on the table.
[Crosstalk] Fran.
Karoline, two separate questions.
Sure.
On the Machado meeting first, what is it that the president feels that he needs to hear from her, or from the opposition party, that he hadn't heard prior to today, or he wanted to hear in the meeting, to be able to convince him to commit to some sort of a timeline for elections?
I'm not sure the president is going into such -- the meeting with expectations like you just laid out, Fran. I don't think he needs to hear anything from Ms. Machado. I think, generally, this is a meeting that the president was willing to take and willing to accept, to meet Ms. Machado in person and to just have a frank and positive discussion about what's taking place in Venezuela.
That's all.
On the subject of Greenland, Jeff Landry, the president's special envoy for Greenland wasn't in the White House meeting yesterday. Can you say why that was and what exactly the role he is playing in these conversations about acquiring Greenland?
Well, the vice president and the secretary of state were present for that meeting. And the meeting, it was a productive meeting. It was a good meeting. And in that meeting, the two sides agreed to really establish a working group of individuals who will continue to have technical talks on the acquisition of Greenland.
Those talks will take place, I'm told, every two to three weeks. So this is a conversation the administration intends to keep having with the Danes and with the respected delegation from Greenland. But the president has made his priority quite clear, he wants the United States to acquire Greenland. He thinks it's in our best national security to do that.
Dina.
There have been multiple instances of American citizens being detained by ICE, and I'm wondering what the administration is asking the agency to do or what steps is the administration asking the agency to take to ensure that Americans are not wrongly arrested?
Obviously, ICE is focused on detaining individuals who are unlawfully present in the country and there have been hundreds of thousands of illegal aliens who have been arrested and detained and deported from this country by ICE over the course of the last year. And that's their intention and that is their goal.
[Crosstalk] Elizabeth?
Thank you, Karoline, what about Greenland reportedly sent troops over there, does that change at all what the president is doing on this? And then a second question, yesterday in a Senate Help hearing, Senator Josh Hawley repeatedly asked a doctor if men can get pregnant and she did not directly answer that.
What are your thoughts on that?
Well, to your -- your first question on Greenland, I don't think troops in Europe impact the president's decision-making process nor does it impact his goal of the acquisition of Greenland at all. To your second question, I mean, anyone in their right mind, with common sense, who's speaking honestly and candidly will say that men cannot get pregnant and I think I can attest to that myself.
So thank you all very much.
Thank you, Karoline.